Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:03-cv-01174_de305> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-01174_de305 RegisterActionDate "2006-03-07" @default.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-01174_de305 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Judge Amy J. St. Eve : On January 20, 2006, the Court advised the parties that they had filed significantly more material under seal than appropriate under Seventh Circuit guidelines. See Union Oil Co. of California v. Leavell 220 F.3d 562, 568 (7th Cir. 2000). The Court should not have permitted the parties to file this excessive amount of materials under seal. The parties submitted a joint proposal regarding sealed pleadings on February 7, 2006, but to date, have not moved to unsealed any documents or portions of documents. Without commenting on the validity of their general proposal, the Court directs the parties to move to unseal or file redacted versions where appropriate of the documents filed under seal in this case by March 17, 2006. The unsealed materials must comply with the Seventh Circuit's directive for sealed materials. As the Seventh Circuit has made clear, "very few categories of documents are kept confidential once their bearing on the merits of a suit has been revealed. In civil litigation only trade secrets, information covered by a recognized privilege (such as the attorney-client privilege), and information required by statute to be maintained in confidence (such as the name of a minor victim of a sexual assault), is entitled to be kept secret on appeal." Baxter Intern., Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 297 F.3d 544, 546 (7th Cir. 2002). Mailed notice (tmh, ) (Entered: 03/07/2006)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-01174_de305 AdministrativeID "290" @default.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-01174_de305 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.