Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:03-cv-05554_de4> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-05554_de4 RegisterActionDate "2003-10-29" @default.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-05554_de4 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER of 10/29/03 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Status hearing set for 11/20/03 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiffs have moved for an extension of time in which to effectuate service. Plaintiffs wish to delay service not because they are for some reason unable to make service, which is a legitimate reason, but because they feel that if defendants learn of this lawsuit, they will retaliate against plaintiffs in some unspecified way. Plaintiffs suggest that defendants will not be prejudiced if the defendants are kept in the dark about this case for another six or eight months, but prejudice to defendants is obvious. Plaintiffs are filing papers, such as the instant motion, which make accusations against defendants have of which defendants have no notice and to which they cannont respond. This compliant must be served promptly. Only when the complaint has been served and both sides are present before the court can the court even consider the kinds of interventions, such as motions for protective orders, which the plaintiffs request. The motion to extend time for service is denied [2-1]. Plaintiffs have requested a protective order but have provided no specific information as to what kind of a protective order they seek against whom, in favor of whom and for what purpose. They have not provided the other side with notice. Nor have they provided an adequate reason for failing to give notice. The motion for a protective order is denied [2-2]. Mailed notice (cem) (Entered: 10/30/2003)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-05554_de4 AdministrativeID "3" @default.
- ilnd;;1:03-cv-05554_de4 OntologyLabel order @default.