Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:06-cv-05160_de195> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:06-cv-05160_de195 RegisterActionDate "2008-10-01" @default.
- ilnd;;1:06-cv-05160_de195 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall: Defendant International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO (IUOE) brought a Motion to Compel, arguing in part that Plaintiff 3780CAD Excavation, Inc.s (3780CAD) response to its requests numbers 16, 17, 20, 21 and 22 was unnacceptable. In those requests, IUOE asked for information related to Merrymans employees, their union affiliation, its fleet of heavy equiptment, and the jobs on which 3780CAD worked. IUOE itself admitted in its Motion to Compel that the requests related to the merits of the underlying grievance. This Court plays only a limited role in reviewing the decision of the arbitrator and is not authorized to review the merits of an award even if the parties allege it rests on errors of fact or misinterpretation of the contract. United Paper Workers Intl Union, AFL-CIO v. Misco, Inc., 484 U.S. 29, 36 (1987). Indeed, the arbitrators award need only draw its essence from the collective bargaining agreement rather than rerpesent the arbitrators own brand of industrial justice to be considered legitimate. Id. The information underlying the original grievance requested by IUOE is unnecessary to determine whether the award is related to the collective bargaining agreement, and indeed it would be inappropriate for this Court to review these facts and the merit of the underlying decision. As such, IUOEs Motion to Compel is denied as to requests numbers 16, 17, 20, 21 and 22. Mailed notice (jms, ) (Entered: 10/01/2008)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:06-cv-05160_de195 AdministrativeID "197" @default.
- ilnd;;1:06-cv-05160_de195 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.