Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de85> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de85 RegisterActionDate "2011-06-23" @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de85 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Jeffrey Cole: Motion hearing held. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and For Summary Judgment, Plaintiff's Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B) Statement, and Plaintiff's Rule 56.1(b)(3)(C) Statement 84 is denied without prejudice with leave to raise the arguments in the reply, except as to the arguments regarding the additional paragraph numbers because that is consistent with and pursuant to the instructions on the Court's website. As discussed on the record, motions to strike are wasteful and disfavored in this Circuit, Redwood v. Dobson, 476 F3d 462, 468 (7th Cir., 2007). See also, Frasier v. Goodale, 342 F3d 1032, 1036 (9th Cir., 2003). Nothing should be construed in anyway as an expression of opinion of the arguments made in the motion. The parties shall discuss the purported inconsistencies in Exhibit 8 attached to Plaintiff's Statement of Additional Material Facts Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B). If defendants are satisfied, the issue should not be raised in their reply. If defendants are not satisfied, then Plaintiff will be given leave to file a sur-reply as to this limited issue only. Defendants' reply in support of their motion shall be filed by 7/25/2011. Telephone conference set for 10/18/2011 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (gmr, ) (Entered: 06/27/2011)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de85 AdministrativeID "87" @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de85 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de85 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de85 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:07-cv-01923_de82 @default.