Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:08-cv-04398_de273> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-04398_de273 RegisterActionDate "2012-12-24" @default.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-04398_de273 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Upon review of the proposed pretrial order, the parties position papers on time limits, and the entirety of the record (including the witness lists and exhibit lists), the Court sets the following time limits: opening statements and closings arguments each will be 1 hour for each side, and each side will have a total of 11 hours of direct and cross examinations. In total, on that schedule, the trial will take around 6 days (jury selection, openings, and some testimony the first day; then 5.5-hour trial days for the 4 remaining days of the week; then perhaps some more testimony, closings, and instructions on the sixth day, Monday, January 14). The time will be expanded (or shortened) for good cause; as the trial progresses, the Court will monitor the appropriateness of the time limits to see if they are too short (or too long). The parties should plan their exams accordingly. It is true that there are 7 defendants, but they have sharply different levels of involvement, with 78AE29C and 8763394 being the lead defendants who encountered Dunlap; and 0E3E5BE and 34950C0 were the arresting officers as to 70AD829. Setting these limits should encourage the focusing of the examinations on material matters and avoid cumulative testimony. Crabtree v. National Steel Corp., 261 F.3d 715, 720 (7th Cir. 2001); M.T. Bonk Co. v. Milton Bradley Co., 945 F.2d 1404, 1408 (7th Cir. 1991).Mailed notice (Chang, Edmond) (Entered: 12/24/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-04398_de273 AdministrativeID "273" @default.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-04398_de273 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.