Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:08-cv-06715_de104> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-06715_de104 RegisterActionDate "2011-12-08" @default.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-06715_de104 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Blanche M. Manning: Responses to motions in limine were due on 11/23/2011. On 12/7/2011 -- fourteen days late and following a call from the court's clerk -- the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a response instanter, stating "[f]iling would be untimely but the Response is brief and plaintiff opposes only five of defendant's eleven motions. Defendant would not require substantial time to reply and would not be prejudiced." Counsel did not offer any reason for the late filing. The court's scheduling orders are not mere suggestions to be ignored at will. Opposing counsel and the court are responsible for other matters and are entitled to be able to plan their schedules in advance so those matters can be addressed in a thoughtful manner. In addition, the pretrial conference is currently scheduled for 12/15/2011. Resetting the briefing schedule at this point thus requires resetting the pretrial conference. Based on the current record, the court would be well within its discretion to deny the motion for leave to file. Nevertheless, in the interests of justice, the motion 104 is granted, with the understanding that if counsel (attorney Hall Adams) seeks leave to file a similar motion in the future, a rule to show cause may issue. Replies are due by no later than 12/15/2011 and the pretrial conference is reset to 12/22/2011 at 10:30 a.m.Mailed notice (rth, ) (Entered: 12/08/2011)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-06715_de104 AdministrativeID "106" @default.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-06715_de104 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:08-cv-06715_de104 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:08-cv-06715_de102 @default.