Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-01352_de17> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01352_de17 RegisterActionDate "2011-05-18" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01352_de17 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: With regard to Defendants' respective motions to dismiss, Plaintiff shall respond on or before 06/09/11 in one combined brief of no more than 25 pages (although it is unlikely that Plaintiff will need that many pages), and Defendants shall reply on or before 06/16/11. Plaintiff's response should take into account the following: first, Plaintiff must identify the specific constitutional text upon which she relies. If Plaintiff is relying on a deprivation of a liberty interest in reputation without due process, then Plaintiff must explain what alteration of legal status, if any, that resulted from Plaintiff's allegedly-false report to DCFS. See Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 711 (1976). For example, did Plaintiff lose custody, even temporarily, of Minor Child during the investigation? Second, Plaintiff need not respond to C83112F argument that good faith immunity applies under 325 ILCS 5/9; that argument raises a factual question that is not properly resolvable by a motion to dismiss. Status hearing of 06/01/11 is reset to 06/30/11 at 8:30a.m.. The parties still must file a status report as detailed in R. 5 by 06/01/11. No court appearance required on 05/19/11. Mailed notice (slb, ) (Entered: 05/18/2011)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01352_de17 AdministrativeID "17" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01352_de17 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.