Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-01863_de56> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01863_de56 RegisterActionDate "2012-06-11" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01863_de56 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MANDATE of USCA dated 04/19/2012 regarding notice of appeal 43 ; USCA No. 11-3318; The following are before the court: 1. Appelle's Motion for Summary Affirmance, and to Suspend the Briefing Schedule, filed on March 20, 2012, by counsel for the appelle. 2. Defendant-Appellee's response to Court's March 28 order, filed on April 4, 2012, by counsel for the appelle. 3. Plaintiff's memoranda on jurisdiction, filed on April 11, 2012, by the pro se appellant. Appellee's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The district court's conclusion that 184373A raised only discrimination and Family Medical Leave Act claims is supported by the record, and 184373A does not argue otherwise. 184373A also does not address in his opening brief the district court's holdings that his claims are time-barred. We have carefully reviewed the final order of the district court, the record on appeal, and the parties' pleadings. Based on this review, the court has determined that any issues which could be raised are insubstantial and that further briefing would not be helpful to the court's consideration of the issues. See Taylor v. City of New Albany, 979 F.2d 87 (7th Cir. 1992); Mather v. Village of Mundelein, 869 F.2d 356, 357 (7th Cir. 1989) (per curiam) (court can decide case on motions papers and record where briefing would be a waste of time and no member of the panel desires briefing or argument). (et, ) (Entered: 06/13/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01863_de56 AdministrativeID "56" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-01863_de56 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-01863_de42 @default.