Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99 RegisterActionDate "2013-08-09" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The Court will conduct an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's motion to amend pleading 89 . The hearing will be conducted on Wednesday, August 28, 2013, beginning at 10:00 a.m. The focus of the hearing will be on the question of the authenticity and accuracy of the content of the original affidavit of Habiba Kamel submitted by the Defendant in support of its motion for summary judgment 60 and to consider how that issue bears on the pending motions before the Court and whether any sanctions are warranted with respect to the submission of that affidavit (or any other that has been submitted in this matter). Each party may call witnesses with relevant testimony, but at a minimum the Court requires the attendance and testimony of counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendant, as well as the following witnesses: Habiba Kamel, 48A182D, Diana Passerelli, 25C85F0, and any employees of counsel for either party who participated in any way in the gathering of information set forth in either of the Kamel affidavits, or in the drafting, editing, execution, or mailing of those affidavits. Counsel for the Plaintiff is responsible for securing the attendance of Ms. Kamel at this hearing, by means of subpoena if necessary; counsel for the Defendant is responsible for similarly securing the attendance of the other required witnesses. Each counsel is required to provide a copy of this order, prior to the hearing, to these witnesses and any other witness that counsel intends to call during the hearing. In addition, counsel for the defendant is required to produce to the Court, on or before 8/21/13, for an initial in camera inspection, all notes and other documents evidencing information provided by Ms. Kamel to the Defendant, defense counsel, or to any of their respective employees. Based on the information provided in Mr. Schimanski's supplemental response 96 , the Court concludes that there is a potential conflict of interest between Mr. Schimanski and Mr. 48A182D, and potentially with other employees of the Defendant; accordingly, Mr. Schimanski will not be permitted to represent any of those persons individually. To the extent that any current or former employee of the Defendant desires the representation of counsel in conjunction with this hearing, they must secure separate counsel and such counsel must enter an appearance in this matter prior to the evidentiary hearing. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 08/09/2013)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99 AdministrativeID "99" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de60 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de89 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de99 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03320_de96 @default.