Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 9 of
9
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 RegisterActionDate "2012-09-21" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Blanche M. Manning:The court's judgment was entered on the docket on 8/1/2012 100 . On 8/23/2012, the court denied Ms. 98A6100 Rule 59 motion to reconsider 109 . On 9/21/2012, Ms. 98A6100 filed an "amended motion for reconsideration with exhibits attached in order to perfect record for the purpose of appealing" 105 , 106 & 107 . She also filed a notice of appeal from the court's 8/23/2012 order denying her Rule 59 motion to reconsider 109 . The second motion to reconsider was filed more than twenty-eight days after the entry of judgment and thus cannot be construed as seeking relief under Rule 59. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Otto v. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co., 814 F.2d 1127, 1139 (7th Cir. 1986). It echoes the original motion to reconsider and does not present any grounds for granting relief under Rule 60. See Chicago Downs Ass'n, Inc. v. Chase, 944 F.2d 366, 370 (7th Cir. 1991) (court may deny Rule 60 relief despite the existence of a pending appeal). Thus, the motion is denied.Mailed notice (tlp, ) (Entered: 09/21/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 AdministrativeID "110" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de100 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de105 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de106 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de107 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de110 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03416_de109 @default.