Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-03468_de306> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03468_de306 RegisterActionDate "2014-11-10" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03468_de306 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cole: Motion hearing held. The plaintiff's motion for approval of class notice plan 302 is granted, over the defendant Bijora, Inc.'s verbal objection at the hearing. That objection was unsupported, and thus waived. Massuda v. Panda Exp., Inc. 759 F.3d 779, 783784 (7th Cir.2014); United States v. Beavers, 756 F.3d 1044, 1059 (7th Cir.2014); Triplett v. Colvin 2014 WL 4978658, n.1 (N.D.Ill.2014)(collecting cases); Edward T. Joyce & Associates, P.C. v. Professionals Direct Insurance Company 2014 WL 4980888, 6 (N.D.Ill.2014)(Norgle, J.). Beyond that, insisting that Opt It, Inc. should be listed as a party in the notice even though all counsel who were present agreed that Opt It was no longer a party would serve no useful purpose or at least not a purpose that counsel could explain. It would seem that including Opt It in the notice (without any explanation) would or potentially could be confusing to the recipient of the notice. It certainly would not appear to advance the purpose of the notice requirement which is to advise all class members of their rights and privileges under the supervision of the court. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 463 F.2d 1075, 1082(7th Cir. 1972). Mailed notice (cdh, ) (Entered: 11/10/2014)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03468_de306 AdministrativeID "304" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03468_de306 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-03468_de306 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-03468_de304 @default.