Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:12-cv-01189_de27> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-01189_de27 RegisterActionDate "2012-10-19" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-01189_de27 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Jeffrey Cole: The plaintiff has moved for entry of an order compelling discovery. 26 . This motion and all future motions like it will be decided against the backdrop of Rickels v. City of South Bend, Indiana, 33 F.3d 785, 786-87 (7th Cir. 1994): 'The great operative principle of Rule 37(a)(4) is that the loser pays.' Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, 8 Federal Practice and Procedure § 2288 at 787 (1970). Fee shifting when the judge must rule on discovery disputes encourages their voluntary resolution and curtails the ability of litigants to use legal processes to heap detriments on adversaries (or third parties) without regard to the merits of the claims." (Parenthesis in original). See also United States Freight Co. v. Penn Cent. Transp. Co., 716 F.2d 954, 955 (2nd Cir.1983)(General deterrence, rather than mere remediation of the particular parties' conduct, is a goal under Rule 37; unconditional impositions of sanctions are necessary to deter other parties to other lawsuits from flouting other discovery orders of other district courts. ). Mailed notice (jms, ) (Entered: 10/19/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-01189_de27 AdministrativeID "28" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-01189_de27 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-01189_de27 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:12-cv-01189_de25 @default.