Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de76> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de76 RegisterActionDate "2013-10-31" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de76 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Jeffrey Cole: Magistrate Judge Status hearing held and continued to 11/12/2013 at 08:30 AM. Motion hearing held. Motion hearing held. The plaintiff's motion to compel discovery 73 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion to extend discovery is entered and continued until the next status. For the reasons stated in open court, the court finds that the approximately 1,000 emails exchanged between the plaintiff in this case and Ms. 7568A2B, a former co-worker, are not protected by the common interest doctrine and must be turned over immediately, and the plaintiff's motion to compel discovery of those emails 73 is granted. The documents, themselves, are not within the protection of the attorney/client privilege and the plaintiff and Ms. 7568A2B do not share an identical legal interest as required by Seventh Circuit precedent. See generally Pampered Chef v. Alexanian, 737 F.Supp.2d 958, 964 -966 (N.D.Ill. 2010). While the plaintiff and Ms. 7568A2B may have shared a common interest in seeing the defendant suffer and be punished for actual or perceived wrongdoing, that is not sufficient. Gulf Islands Leasing, Inc. v. Bombardier Capital, Inc., 215 F.R.D. 466, 473 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). Plaintiff's motion to preclude certain claims and/or defenses 75 is denied without prejudice. This motion should be filed and noticed before Judge Tharp. Defendant shall immediately comply with the order of 8/27/2013. As to plaintiff's document request #13, is granted but only until the date of plaintiff's termination plus 3 months thereafter. Requests #14 and #15 are denied, #16 has been complied with, #17,18,19, and 23 are denied as overly broad. As to #20 the parties have an agreement, #22 defendant represents that there are no additional documents beyond those that have been produced. Defendant shall complete production by 11/8/2013. After the email production has been completed, defendant shall file a certification as outlined in open court, attesting either that there are no responsive documents or that the production being made is complete. Plaintiff's oral motion to extend discovery is taken under advisement and will be decided at the next status conference and will depend upon the amount of additional materials provided by the defendant. The parties are urged to consult further regarding their settlement discussions and if they both conclude that a settlement conference might be fruitful, the court stands ready to have such a conference at their convenience.Mailed notice (jms, ) (Entered: 10/31/2013)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de76 AdministrativeID "78" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de76 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de76 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de71 @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de76 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:12-cv-09359_de73 @default.