Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de54> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de54 RegisterActionDate "2016-05-17" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de54 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: Petitioner's motion to amend/supplement 54 is denied. Petitioner may not file successive motions to reconsider and his motion could be denied on that basis alone. See Andrew v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 447 F.3d 510, 516 (7th Cir. 2006)(explaining that a party ordinarily gets "one shot" at asking the district court to reconsider its judgment); Charles v. Daley, 799 F.2d 343, 348 (7th Cir. 1986)("A successive motion directed to the same judgment is ineffectual[.]"). But even considering his arguments, as explained in the Court's May 16, 2016 Order 53 . Petitioner does not raise a valid basis for reconsideration. Any disagreement Petitioner has with the Court's analysis or interpretation should be raised in an appeal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Mailed Notice. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 5/17/2016.(gcy, ) (Entered: 05/18/2016)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de54 AdministrativeID "56" @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de54 OntologyLabel order @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de54 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de51 @default.
- ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de54 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:12-cv-10100_de53 @default.