Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de29> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de29 RegisterActionDate "2013-10-22" @default.
- ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de29 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Motion hearing held on Defendant's motion to vacate default judgment of foreclosure 26 . The motion was filed on 10/03/2013, but noticed for 19 days later (today), which is more than the 14-day limit in Local Rule 5.3(b). This time-gap suggests a delay tactic, particularly because Plaintiff's counsel's explanations for the time-gap shifted from convenience of "the Court's schedule" (but the Court has been hearing motions for four days per week) and counsel's "trial" schedule to really counsel's unspecified schedule of motion (not trial) hearings. But even on consideration of the motion, for the reasons stated in open court, Defendant's motion is denied without prejudice to refiling a motion with a detailed good-cause explanation, as previously ordered, see R. 20, for the delay in answering or otherwise defending the case, including asking for an extension of time to answer. Mailed notice (slb, ) (Entered: 10/22/2013)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de29 AdministrativeID "28" @default.
- ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de29 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de29 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de29 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:13-cv-01982_de27 @default.