Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:14-cv-07814_de43> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:14-cv-07814_de43 RegisterActionDate "2015-07-23" @default.
- ilnd;;1:14-cv-07814_de43 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Pierce's motion to file a sur-reply brief 40 is granted in view of the new arguments raised in the reply brief. The sur-reply is due by 07/29/2015. Pierce should only address liability. Pierce need not address the bona fide error defense. When the Court halted discovery to allow summary judgment briefing, it did so based on counsel's representations and an understanding that summary judgment would be limited to liability, and that the bona fide error defense in particular was not going to part of the motions. R. 39 (transcript of 03/24/2015 status hearing). Pierce specifically requested that, if its summary judgment motion on liability were denied, that it be allowed to do discovery on the issue. Id. And 7AC8376 did not object to that plan. It was therefore improper for 7AC8376 to seek summary judgment on the defense, knowing that discovery had been stayed. For that reason, 7AC8376 motion for summary judgment, R. 25, is denied as to the bona fide error defense. (Of course, Pierce could have and should have protected itself by moving for relief under Rule 56(d).Emailed notice (slb, ) (Entered: 07/23/2015)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:14-cv-07814_de43 AdministrativeID "42" @default.
- ilnd;;1:14-cv-07814_de43 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:14-cv-07814_de43 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:14-cv-07814_de41 @default.