Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:19-cv-05844_de66> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-05844_de66 RegisterActionDate "2020-10-15" @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-05844_de66 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: On September 15, 2020, the Court ordered the plaintiff to respond to the pending motion to dismiss 56 by September 28, 2020, but he has not done so. The Court extends the deadline for the plaintiff to respond to October 30, 2020, and the defendants are given until November 13, 2020 to reply. The court reminds the plaintiff that failure to respond to a motion to dismiss may result in a dismissal for failure to prosecute. See Lee v. Ne. Ill. Reg'l Commuter R.R. Corp., 912 F.3d 1049, 105354 (7th Cir. 2019) ("Even a complaint that passes muster under the liberal notice pleading requirements of Civil Rule 8(a)(2) can be subject to dismissal if a plaintiff does not provide argument in support of the legal adequacy of the complaint. This rule applies when a party fails to develop arguments related to a discrete issue or when a litigant effectively abandons the litigation by not responding to alleged deficiencies in a motion to dismiss.").Mailed notice (ca, ) (Entered: 10/15/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-05844_de66 AdministrativeID "66" @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-05844_de66 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-05844_de66 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:19-cv-05844_de56 @default.