Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52 RegisterActionDate "2020-08-12" @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: This case have been referred to Magistrate Judge Gilbert for all discovery motions and supervision and settlement conference 48 . The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report 39 filed on 6/4/20. The previously set date of 8/14/20 40 for the parties to file a revised joint status report shall stand as the Court assumes the parties already are engaged in the process of preparing that report. In addition to the topics included in the Court's order of 6/6/20 40 (i.e., a proposed date for the close of fact discovery and an assessment of whether settlement is a realistic possibility in this case), the parties' joint status report also shall address at least the following topics: (a) whether the parties have served responses to each other's written discovery requests (including without limitation by producing documents) and, if not, when responses are due to be served and when document production will be complete if it is not already complete; (b) whether there are any disputes about either side's responses to the other's written discovery as of now and, if so, whether the parties are engaged in efforts to resolve those disputes in accordance with Local Rule 37.2, and when the parties propose that process will conclude; (c) if the parties anticipate they will need to submit any ripe discovery disputes to the Court for resolution, then they shall propose a date for filing of any such motions and a briefing schedule for those motions; (d) how many depositions each party anticipates taking, the identity of the deponents to the extent they are reasonably ascertainable now, and, to the extent possible, when the parties anticipate taking those depositions with confirmed or at least proposed deposition dates or date ranges; (e) whether the parties agree to take depositions by remote means if a witness or counsel for a party or witness prefer to conduct depositions in that way for safety or other reasons; and (f) a date by which Defendants will respond to Plaintiff's settlement proposal if they have not already done so. The Court notes it will need this information to evaluate whether the parties' proposed discovery close date is reasonable. If the parties need more time to prepare an updated joint status report that addresses all the topics referenced in this order and in the 6/4/20 order 40 , then they should jointly contact the Court's courtroom deputy with a request for a reasonable extension of time within which to do so. An email request to the Court's courtroom deputy from counsel for all parties is sufficient for these purposes. Mailed notice (ber, ) (Entered: 08/12/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52 AdministrativeID "51" @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de40 @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de41 @default.
- ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de52 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:19-cv-07711_de49 @default.