Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cr-00904_de10> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cr-00904_de10 RegisterActionDate "2021-02-19" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cr-00904_de10 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER as to 9D13C01:Initial proceedings and Arraignment held on 2/19/2021 via telephone. The Court grants oral motion by Ellen Domph for appointment CJA. Defendant acknowledged receipt of the Indictment, waived formal reading and entered a plea of not guilty. Rule 16.1(a) conference to be held by 3/5/2021; pretrial motions due by 4/19/2021; responses by 5/3/2021; replies by 5/10/2021. Telephone conference set for 4/20/2021 at 10:00 AM. Defendant's counsel to contact US Marshals Service to arrange a date for processing. [Enter Order Setting Conditions for Release]. Pretrial Services to install electronic monitoring on 2/19/2021. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the conference call-in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (866) 434-5269 and the access code is 8087837. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Time is excluded without objection, 2/19/2021 to 4/20/2021, pursuant to 18:3161(h) (7)(A)(B). Pursuant to Rule 5(f), the court confirms the United States' continuing duty to disclose material evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. If the court finds that the government has failed to comply with this obligation, the court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information; grant a continuance; impose evidentiary and other appropriate sanctions, such as requiring additional discovery training; order a new trial; or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 2/19/2021. Mailed notice (ph, ) (Entered: 02/23/2021)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cr-00904_de10 AdministrativeID "11" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cr-00904_de10 OntologyLabel order @default.