Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cv-01459_de22> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01459_de22 RegisterActionDate "2020-05-18" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01459_de22 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's motion to supplement the complaint 14 is granted. The proposed supplement describes an event that happened after the date of the complaint, and a "party may assert separate or additional claims or defenses arising after commencement of the action" in a Rule 15(d) supplemental pleading. 6A Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1504 (3d ed.); Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d). The supplement alleges facts that are closely related to the original transaction because they both involve plaintiff's access to a CPAP machine over a relatively short and discrete moment in time. The supplemental claim (if it is a separate claim) would not be misjoined. Plaintiff's supplement is ambiguous; plaintiff does not explain which defendant is allegedly liable on account of the machine's removal. And plaintiff's supplement is not clear about whether plaintiff is asserting a new claim under the ADA, a new theory of liability, or simply some facts that plaintiff wants to include in his complaint. These are issues that can be sorted out through motion practice or amendment of the pleadings. For now, the motion to supplement is granted. Defendants' response to the supplement is stayed. After the pending motion to dismiss is fully briefed and ruled upon, the court will enter a schedule that addresses the supplement. Discovery is also stayed while the motion to dismiss is pending. Notices mailed. (psm, ) (Entered: 05/18/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01459_de22 AdministrativeID "21" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01459_de22 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01459_de22 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:20-cv-01459_de15 @default.