Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57 RegisterActionDate "2020-03-31" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. The parties' "emergency" motion for an extension of time to file post-trial motions 51 is dismissed as moot (Dkts. 949 and 951 in 17 C 1973) is dismissed as moot pursuant to the Court's General Order 20-0012 and the Court's Amended General Order 20-0012 which read in pertinent part: 2. Amended General Order 20-0012 extended by 21 days all deadlines, in all civil cases and Executive Committee matters, whether set by the court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or the Local Rules. This Second Amended General Order extends all deadlines in civil cases and Executive Committee matters by an additional 28 days. These extensions were and continue to be subject to the following exceptions: a) Amended General Order 20-0012 did not affect, and this Second Amended General Order does not affect, the rights to or deadlines concerning any appeal from any decision of this Court in a civil case. That is, the deadlines for filing a notice of appeal in a civil case remain in place and must be followed to preserve appellate rights. The Court invites parties to move under Appellate Rule 4(a)(5)(A) for an extension of time to appeal. If a timely extension motion is filed, then the Court deems that good cause exists for the extension given the public health emergency. Parties should note that any extensions of the appeal deadlines in civil cases are subject to the limits imposed by Appellate Rule 4(a)(5)(C), and that the Court cannot grant a second extension under Appellate Rule 4(a)(5). b) Amended General Order 20-0012 did not grant, and this Second Amended General Order does not grant, an extension of any deadlines imposed by Civil Rules 50(b) or (d), 52(b), 59(b), (d), or (e), or 60(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(2). The parties in this case are represented by highly skilled litigation attorneys who must read the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the General Orders from this Court. As they should know, a motion under Rule 50(b) and 59 is due 28 days after judgment. The judgment was entered on March 5 and the parties have 28 days from that day to file their motions. Fed. R. Civ. P. (6)(b)(2) does not allow for an extension of time for the motions that the parties intend to file. Although the motion for extended page limits is clearly not an emergency motion either, in the interest of saving Judge Norgle the time of completing this order, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants shall follow the rules of civil procedure and file their combined Rule 50(b) and Rule 59 motions within 28 days after judgment. They are permitted to file up to 40 pages. Plaintiffs shall respond 28 days after the filing of the Defendants' motions. They are permitted to file up to 40 pages. Defendants shall file their reply 14 days after the filing of the response. They are permitted up 25 pages for the reply. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 03/31/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57 AdministrativeID "55" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57 hasIfpJudgeAttribution SJ000716 @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57 hasIfpLabel IFP_OTHER @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de57 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:20-cv-01792_de53 @default.