Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cv-03656_de9> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-03656_de9 RegisterActionDate "2020-07-09" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-03656_de9 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the complaint (Dckt. No. 1 ). Plaintiff attached a number of filings from a state-court lawsuit against Bank of America. Based on the Court's preliminary review, it appears that Plaintiff may be attempting to collaterally challenge an adverse judgment in a foreclosure lawsuit in state court. But under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, federal courts cannot hear "cases brought by state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments." See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005). One week ago, the Seventh Circuit dismissed a similar lawsuit that challenged a foreclosure proceeding. See Kasprzyk v. Axiom Financial LLC, 2020 WL 3583465 (7th Cir. 2020). That case involved a claim that there were "false statements" made in the state court case. Id. at *2. The complaint sought relief for statements that were "fraudulent." The same result seemingly applies here because Plaintiff brings fraud claims relating to a state court foreclosure proceeding. By July 31, 2020, Plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. If Plaintiff does not establish that this case is not barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine by July 31, 2020, this case will be dismissed.Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 07/09/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-03656_de9 AdministrativeID "11" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-03656_de9 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-03656_de9 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:20-cv-03656_de0 @default.