Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cv-06531_de18> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-06531_de18 RegisterActionDate "2020-11-17" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-06531_de18 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration or leave to file an interlocutory appeal 18 is denied. Taking all well-pleaded facts in the plaintiff's complaint as true, venue is not proper in the Western District of Michigan, because none of the events giving rise to plaintiff's claim occurred there and the venue does not otherwise have personal jurisdiction over Illinois defendants 2184066 and Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (a court may transfer action to any other district 'where it might have been brought' in first instance); 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The plaintiff does not have leave to file an interlocutory appeal from the Court's order denying his motion for change of venue because 026E177 motion does not present a question of law about which there is "substantial ground for difference of opinion." 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b); In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, 878 F. Supp. 1078 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (the existence of a "difficult central question of law which is not settled by controlling authority" must be demonstrated). Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 11/17/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-06531_de18 AdministrativeID "19" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-06531_de18 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-06531_de18 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:20-cv-06531_de17 @default.