Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/vaed;;2:16-cv-00719_de127> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- vaed;;2:16-cv-00719_de127 RegisterActionDate "2017-08-15" @default.
- vaed;;2:16-cv-00719_de127 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 92 Partial Objection to Magistrate Judge's Ruling. The Court finds that, with respect to the partial objection, the Order is not clearly erroneous, nor is it contrary to law. Moreover, the Court notes that, with respect to the work product doctrine objection, and with respect to the attorney-client privilege objection, and strictly construing the assertion of protection and privilege, United Rentals has failed to satisfy its burden of proof and meet the exacting standard necessary to 1) demonstrate facts supporting the requested work product protection, and to 2) specifically and factually support its claim of privilege. RLI Ins. Co. v. Conseco, Inc., 477 F. Supp.2d 741, 748, 750-51 (E.D. Va. 2007). Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 08/15/2017. (Davis, Mark) (Entered: 08/15/2017)" @default.
- vaed;;2:16-cv-00719_de127 AdministrativeID "104" @default.
- vaed;;2:16-cv-00719_de127 OntologyLabel order @default.
- vaed;;2:16-cv-00719_de127 hasReferenceToOtherEntry vaed;;2:16-cv-00719_de111 @default.