Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de120> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de120 RegisterActionDate "2018-10-30" @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de120 RegisterActionDescriptionText "JUDGMENT ISSUED AS MANDATE 10/30/2018 of USCA (certified copy) as to E472F2F re 95 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, 11th Circuit Appeal No. 17-15386-AA ; We review for plain error when a defendant fails to object to an alleged error before the district court. See United States v. Raad, 406 F.3d 1322, 1323 (11th Cir.2005) (per curiam). When a defendant expressly consents to or affirmatively seeks a district courts decision, he is deemed to have invited any error the court may have made and thus waives appellate review for plain error. United States v. Brannan, 562 F.3d 1300, 1306 (11th Cir. 2009).E472F2F waived these challenges to his sentence by requesting the 180-month mandatory minimum sentence that the district court imposed. In any event,our circuit and every circuit to have considered the issue has concluded that the 15-year minimum mandatory sentence under ACCA is neither disproportionate tothe offense nor cruel and unusual punishment. United States v. Reynolds, 215F.3d 1210, 1214 (11th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). AFFIRMED. See USCA 112 Per Curiam Opinion entered on 10/01/2018. (ydw, ) (Entered: 10/30/2018)" @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de120 AdministrativeID "115" @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de120 OntologyLabel judgment @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de120 hasReferenceToOtherEntry almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de116 @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de120 hasReferenceToOtherEntry almd;;2:16-cr-00568_de96 @default.