Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/cand;;3:16-cv-03371_de62> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cand;;3:16-cv-03371_de62 RegisterActionDate "2016-12-18" @default.
- cand;;3:16-cv-03371_de62 RegisterActionDescriptionText "Order granting 55 Stipulation entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The court approves the setting of the pending motions for 12/22/2016 at 9:30 a.m., primarily because the plaintiffs' counsel represented in other filings before YGR that there is a conflicting trial in January. Otherwise, the court thinks that judicial economy and other burdens militate in favor of hearing the motions at the next date for the related case, which is 1/12/2017, and after the parties in the related cases confer on a joint case-management plan. (The mandate will issue by then.) The plaintiffs also filed a sur reply. Under the circumstances, the court asks the defendant to respond if possible on Monday (and the response can be very informal). If that timing is not reasonable, the court would appreciate a short filing with the defendant's timeline (which the court will accommodate). The court apologizes for the timing of this response to the parties' stipulation at ECF No. 55 (filed 12/7/2016) and to the defendant's opposition to the request to file the sur reply at ECF No. 56 (filed 12/9/2016) and realizes that the motions were fully briefed on transfer (thus complying with the two-week date for a hearing after full briefing under the local rules). But it is not the ordinary advance notice of a dispute under the local rules' motions schedule or the court's ordinary case-management approach to coordinating motions in advance, which made it rushed from an overall flow-of-work perspective. Thus, the court needed to read everything first to see whether it made sense to hear the case on 12/22/2017. Given counsel's scheduling issues, it does. That said, the court asks the parties to touch base on Monday about coordination and scheduling issues and to let the court know if their views on timing have changed. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 12/18/2016)" @default.
- cand;;3:16-cv-03371_de62 AdministrativeID "57" @default.
- cand;;3:16-cv-03371_de62 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cand;;3:16-cv-03371_de62 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cand;;3:16-cv-03371_de60 @default.