Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de177> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de177 RegisterActionDate "2017-09-22" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de177 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER striking Plaintiff Makeen's Reply to Response to Objection to Magistrate's Recommendation 176 . Plaintiff Makeen's Reply--which is substantially identical to the "Supplemental" briefing which the Court previously rejected (See ECF Nos. 174 & 175)--is STRICKEN. Even if Defendants had filed a Response to which this Reply might be addressed (which Defendants have not yet done), this Court's Revised Practice Standard III.I.2 clearly states that "In conformity with Rule 72, no reply brief in support of an objection will be accepted." No matter what title is put on the paper, the Court will accept no additional untimely briefing in response to Judge Shaffer's Recommendation 165 absent prior leave or Order of the Court. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/22/2017. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) (Entered: 09/22/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de177 AdministrativeID "177" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de177 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de177 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de165 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de177 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-01250_de176 @default.