Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-00332_de21> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00332_de21 RegisterActionDate "2017-02-13" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00332_de21 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction 21 . The Reply, at 19 pages long, is in flagrant violation of the Court's order that the Reply "shall be limited to 12 pages" (ECF No. 14 at 2), and as a consequence the Court normally would have summarily stricken the filing. Solely in the interest of justice, and given the exigent circumstances of this preliminary injunction proceeding, the Court will nonetheless accept the Reply as filed. However, it advances an argument not made in Plaintiffs' opening brief, namely, that the Jeppesen Terminal is a designated public forum (as opposed to a traditional public forum). The Court finds that, in fairness, Defendants must receive an opportunity to respond to this new argument. Accordingly, Defendants are GRANTED LEAVE to file a surreply of equal length, namely, up to 19 pages exclusive of attorney signature block and certificate of service. Defendants' surreply must be filed no later than tomorrow, February 14, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 02/13/2017. Text Only Entry (wjmlc1) (Entered: 02/13/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00332_de21 AdministrativeID "22" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00332_de21 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00332_de21 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-00332_de20 @default.