Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/ctd;;3:16-cv-01425_de166> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ctd;;3:16-cv-01425_de166 RegisterActionDate "2020-09-14" @default.
- ctd;;3:16-cv-01425_de166 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 151 motion. Reconsideration will be granted only if the moving party can identify "controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked" and that would reasonably be expected to alter the courts decision. See Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P., 684 F.3d 36, 52 (2d Cir. 2012) (citing Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995)). When reviewing a motion for reconsideration, the court considers whether there is "an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice." Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc., 729 F.3d at 104 (quoting Virgin Atl. Airways, Ltd., 956 F.2d at 1255). A motion for reconsideration "is not a vehicle for relitigating old issues, presenting the case under new theories, securing a rehearing on the merits, or otherwise taking a second bite at the apple." Analytical Surveys, Inc., 684 F.3d at 52. The defendants have failed to point to "an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice," id., sufficient to warrant a change to the court's underlying ruling in this case. Therefore, the motion is denied. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 09/14/20. (Covello, Alfred) (Entered: 09/14/2020)" @default.
- ctd;;3:16-cv-01425_de166 AdministrativeID "161" @default.
- ctd;;3:16-cv-01425_de166 OntologyLabel order @default.
- ctd;;3:16-cv-01425_de166 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ctd;;3:16-cv-01425_de156 @default.