Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:07-cv-04446_de877> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-04446_de877 RegisterActionDate "2017-02-12" @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-04446_de877 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The defense motion to file a reply expert report 875 is granted in large part but the proposed schedule is modified. Often, the Court sets an expert discovery schedule that says that both sides shall make expert disclosures to offer evidence that the respective party would wish to introduce regardless of whether the other side discloses evidence on the same subject. Then the parties make responsive disclosures, and then take depositions. The Court could have done that here, but instead trusted the parties to propose a structure and schedule. The parties proposed a Plaintiffs-first structure. It should have been evident to both sides that quality of care was going to be a disputed issue as a possible basis for price increases. If the Court had invoked its usual structure, then we would not need an extension. In the interests of justice, the defense should be permitted to reply to Plaintiffs' new treatment of the topic. Indeed, the Court would have expected Rule 26(e) supplements from Meyer anyway, in order to address Romano's report (which was not really a reply). But the schedule shall proceed as follows: Romano's deposition is supposed to be taken by 02/22/2017. R. 868. Meyer shall disclose the reply report by 03/24/2017. His deposition will be taken by 04/17/2017 (by 02/21/2017, the parties shall schedule his deposition for a date before 04/17/2017 so that he is booked sooner rather than later). Summary judgment motions are due by 05/10/2017. To forestall a situation where each side splinters its summary judgment issues into multiple motions, multiple briefs, and multiple 56.1 Statements (like a summary judgment motion on one element of a claim or defense masquerading as a separate motion and obtaining another 15-pages of briefing and 40 more 56.1 paragraphs), each side shall file *one* summary judgment motion and then file *one* supporting brief and *one* 56.1 Statement that asks for all the Rule 56 relief that is sought by the respective side. So in advance of the 05/10/2017 deadline, the parties should be estimating how many pages and 56.1 paragraphs they need and file a respective motion for extra pages and paragraphs, explaining the need. When the briefs are filed, each party shall add a.pdf bookmark for the major point headings, to enable the Court to navigate the briefs easily. 56.1 Statements also shall be organized with point headings and corresponding.pdf bookmarks to those point headings in order to help the Court's review. The response briefs and 56.1 responses are due by 06/21/2017. Replies are due by 07/07/2017. The status hearing of 02/16/2017 is reset to 04/24/2017 at 9:30 a.m., by which time discovery will be finished.Emailed notice (Chang, Edmond) (Entered: 02/12/2017)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-04446_de877 AdministrativeID "880" @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-04446_de877 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:07-cv-04446_de877 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:07-cv-04446_de872 @default.