Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191 RegisterActionDate "2012-03-01" @default.
- ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Young B. Kim: Motion hearing held. Defendant's motion to overrule Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's discovery requests 179 is entered and continued. The court is inclined to deny the motion without prejudice. Defendant did not heed the District Court's instruction to limit its supplementary discovery requests to matters raised by Plaintiff's renewed class certification motion. Rather, because Defendant served its supplementary discovery requests before Plaintiff filed its renewed motion, some of those requests exceed the scope of Plaintiff's renewed motion. Specifically, the information and documents sought by Defendant in its supplemental interrogatories 7 and 8, supplemental requests for production of documents 1, 3, 6-9 and requests for admission 1-9, are not relevant at this time. These discovery requests will be relevant only if the assigned District Judge finds that Anderson + Wanca secured certain information from Caroline Abraham under false pretense, violated ethical rules during its solicitation of Creative Montessori Learning Center as a client, and/or disqualifies Anderson + Wanca as class counsel. The court is aware that the assigned District Judge, when ruling on Plaintiff's motion for class certification, commented that Anderson + Wanca's "conduct [related to certain information it obtained from Abraham] was unseemly" and that he did not have sufficient information to determine whether Anderson + Wanca violated ethical rules. (R. 165 at 10-11.) But Defendant represented in open court during today's motion hearing that the assigned District Judge has made factual findings that Anderson + Wanca did obtain information from Abraham under false pretense and that it did troll for clients in violation of ethical guidelines. If that is so, there may be a reasonable basis for Defendant to discover information about the business relationship between Anderson + Wanca and Bock & Hatch and the extent of such relationship as it pertains to this case because that discovery may be relevant to Defendant's opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for renewed Second Amended Class Certification 177 . Defendant is invited to provide the court with a copy of the District Court's order finding such misconduct or a transcript detailing such misconduct by no later than March 8, 2012. If Defendant does not file such order or transcript by March 8, 2012, the court will issue an order on March 9, 2012, denying the motion 179 without prejudice for the reasons stated in this order as well as in open court that Defendant's discovery requests are premature. Mailed notice (aac, ) (Entered: 03/01/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191 AdministrativeID "189" @default.
- ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de179 @default.
- ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de191 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:09-cv-03963_de181 @default.