Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 9 of
9
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 RegisterActionDate "2012-01-30" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed [R. 3 ] in forma pauperis is granted in light of his lack of financial resources. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [R. 4 ] is denied without prejudice at this point. Plaintiff has satisfied the first requirement for appointment of counsel: he reports that he has made efforts to find counsel, and he lists some of those he contacted. However, at this point, Plaintiff's claim appears to be very straightforward, a challenge to the length of time he spent in custody. R. 1. It might very well be that if the sheriff held Plaintiff in custody pursuant to a bond revocation, as the complaint seems to suggest, the sheriff will receive a form of judicial immunity for carrying out the judge's order. But the case should proceed to service and further litigation. The Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff the necessary forms for issuance of summons, and the Marshals Service shall serve the summons. Plaintiff should return the forms for issuance of summons as promptly as possible. To monitor the case, a status hearing is set for February 28, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. Mailed notice (lp, ) (Entered: 01/31/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 AdministrativeID "6" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 hasIfpJudgeAttribution SJ000685 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 hasIfpLabel IFP_GRANT @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de2 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de5 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-05580_de3 @default.