Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-08403_de5> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-08403_de5 RegisterActionDate "2012-01-30" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-08403_de5 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff's motion to proceed [R. 4] in forma pauperis is granted in light of Plaintiff's lack of financial resources. The complaint also survives the screening review for frivolousness, 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), because the allegations describe an alleged arrest without probable cause and a potential malicious prosecution claim. Plaintiff's motion for appointment [R. 5] of counsel is also granted. In applying the standard set forth in Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc), Plaintiff has made the threshold showing of a reasonable search for counsel. He names several lawyers and law firms that he contacted. Moreover, Plaintiff, a high-school graduate, is not likely to be able to competently litigate this claim. Although the factual allegations are not necessarily complex, a section 1983 lawsuit often involves complex issues, such as qualified immunity. Status hearing set for March 1, 2012 at 8:30 a.m., which should be sufficient time for appointed counsel to become familiar with the case. Mailed notice (slb, ) (Entered: 01/30/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-08403_de5 AdministrativeID "6" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-08403_de5 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-08403_de5 hasIfpJudgeAttribution SJ000685 @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-08403_de5 hasIfpLabel IFP_GRANT @default.