Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:17-cv-02278_de26> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-02278_de26 RegisterActionDate "2017-09-03" @default.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-02278_de26 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The Court's order of 8/8/2017 (dkt. no. 20) contemplated that defendant would file a motion for summary judgment by 8/25/2017 and that if plaintiff contended that it required discovery in order to respond to the motion, it would file a submission under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) by 9/1/2017. Defendant filed its summary judgment motion on time, and plaintiff did not make a Rule 56(d) submission within the time ordered by the Court and did not seek an extension of time. The hearing date of 9/6/2017 on the anticipated Rule 56(d) submission is therefore vacated. In addition, plaintiff's earlier-filed motion to extend discovery 16 is denied to the extent it might be considered a Rule 56(d) submission, as it is insufficient under that Rule to defer consideration of defendant's summary judgment motion. The Court also observes that based on the grounds asserted in defendant's motion, any evidence that plaintiff would appear to need in order to respond likely is already in plaintiff's hands. The previously-set schedule on defendant's summary judgment motion (see dkt. no. 15) remains in effect: plaintiff's response is to be filed by 9/23/2017, and defendant's reply is to be filed by 10/5/2017. (mk) (Entered: 09/03/2017)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-02278_de26 AdministrativeID "26" @default.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-02278_de26 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-02278_de26 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:17-cv-02278_de16 @default.