Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/cacd;;2:16-cv-04697_de58> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cacd;;2:16-cv-04697_de58 RegisterActionDate "2017-07-18" @default.
- cacd;;2:16-cv-04697_de58 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: REFirst APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Extend Time to file Expert Report filed by defendant 56 . Defendants application suffers from two defects. First, the application fails to include a proposed order as required by Local Rule 7-20. Second, the application was not styled correctly or submitted with adequate time to provide relief from the deadline. If Defendants intended for the Court to consider their application on an ex parte (emergency) basis, they would need to have filed it at least 48 hours prior to the deadline in order to afford Plaintiffs time to oppose. If Defendants did not intend to have the application considered on an emergency basis, they should have noticed it for a hearing date. (See Standing Order, ECF No. 7.) An application that has not been stipulated to or designated as unopposed cannot be filed less than 24 hours before the deadline to be extended, as it provides an impossible timeline for the other side to oppose it and the Court to rule on it before the deadline has passed. (lc) (Entered: 07/18/2017)" @default.
- cacd;;2:16-cv-04697_de58 AdministrativeID "59" @default.
- cacd;;2:16-cv-04697_de58 hasJudgeReference SJ003012 @default.
- cacd;;2:16-cv-04697_de58 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cacd;;2:16-cv-04697_de55 @default.