Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/dcd;;1:16-cv-02405_de46> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- dcd;;1:16-cv-02405_de46 RegisterActionDate "2019-01-10" @default.
- dcd;;1:16-cv-02405_de46 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER. The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's 27 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 22, 2018 memorandum opinion and order. The plaintiff limits his request for reconsideration to the Court's dismissal of his common-law claims. However, certain of the plaintiff's arguments, if accepted, would appear to impact the Court's holdings with respect to the plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claims. See Pl.s' Mot. for Recons. at 8 (arguing that "not every violation of a 4th Amendment requires a seizure or an 'arrest'"); id. at 9 (arguing that the plaintiff's return to the general population of D.C. jail was caused by his false imprisonment and that "[e]ven in the 4th Amendment context, neither Florence nor Bell ever suggested that arrestees and other prisoners lose their expectations of privacy in their bodies just because they are in jail"). The Court will therefore direct the parties to appear for a hearing at which they should be prepared to address both the merits of the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration and its relationship, if any, to the Fourth Amendment claims previously dismissed. It is ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status report on or before January 15, 2019 proposing at least three possible dates for such a hearing and indicating whether either party seeks permission to file supplemental briefing in advance of the hearing. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on January 10, 2019. (lcdlf1) (Entered: 01/10/2019)" @default.
- dcd;;1:16-cv-02405_de46 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- dcd;;1:16-cv-02405_de46 hasJudgeReference SJ002361 @default.
- dcd;;1:16-cv-02405_de46 hasReferenceToOtherEntry dcd;;1:16-cv-02405_de40 @default.