Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/flmd;;8:16-cv-02624_de18> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- flmd;;8:16-cv-02624_de18 RegisterActionDate "2019-05-08" @default.
- flmd;;8:16-cv-02624_de18 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court previously declined to issue a certificate of appealability. (Dkt. 15, pp. 4-5). To obtain a certificate of appealability, 4B06A69 must show that reasonable jurists would find debatable both (1) the merits of the underlying claims and (2) the procedural issues he seeks to raise. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). As 4B06A69 has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the Court's timeliness determination, he cannot satisfy the second prong of the Slack test. A certificate of appealability is therefore denied. Because 4B06A69 is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 5/8/2019. (BGS) (Entered: 05/08/2019)" @default.
- flmd;;8:16-cv-02624_de18 AdministrativeID "18" @default.
- flmd;;8:16-cv-02624_de18 hasReferenceToOtherEntry flmd;;8:16-cv-02624_de17 @default.