Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de218> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de218 RegisterActionDate "2017-09-15" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de218 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/15/2017. On August 17, 2017, the Court denied Plaintiffs request for injunctive relief. 167 . It did not believe it likely that Plaintiff would prevail on the merits. It also found that Plaintiff had an available legal remedy and would not suffer irreparable harm if the motion were not granted. Plaintiff subsequently filed a notice of intent to file interlocutory appeal and now files 177 , a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. An interlocutory appeal may be allowed by the Court of Appeals if this court finds that there is "a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal... may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation...." 28 U.S.C. section 1292(b). The Court sees no debatable question of law, nor does the Court feel that an immediate appeal would materially advance the termination of the litigation. 177 is DENIED. If the plaintiff wishes to contest this court's finding, he must file a motion with the Court of Appeals seeking review of this court's certification within 30 days after service of this order. See Fed.R.App.P. 24(a). The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. (JMB, ilcd) (Entered: 09/15/2017)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de218 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de218 hasJudgeReference SJ001500 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de218 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de203 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de218 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de217 @default.