Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de169> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de169 RegisterActionDate "2017-06-27" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de169 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 6/27/2017. Plaintiff has filed a motion asking the Court to impose sanctions on Defendants for their delays in producing the names of the potential John Doe Defendants. 132 The Court just recently held its third status hearing to discuss discovery issues in this case. See June 13, 2017 Minute Entry; see also January 18, 2017 Minute Entry; May 2, 2017 Minute Entry. It is clear from the record before this Court that the parties have engaged in extensive discovery. In fact, Defendants have responded to 13 separate discovery requests and provided more than 2,300 pages of discovery to the Plaintiff. See June 19, 2017 Case Management Order. Furthermore, the Court specifically addressed the need to finalize the identity of any remaining John Doe Defendants during the hearing held two weeks ago. While Plaintiff stated he had not received all the information needed, he also repeatedly stated he did not believe Defense counsel had intentionally acted in bad faith. The Court also notes Plaintiff has subsequently filed a motion to add Defendants 130 and Plaintiff's motion for sanctions does not address any claimed discovery violations which occurred after the June 13, 2017 hearing. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is denied. 132 (JS, ilcd) (Entered: 06/27/2017)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de169 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de169 hasJudgeReference SJ001502 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de169 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de164 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de169 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01064_de166 @default.