Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de24> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de24 RegisterActionDate "2016-11-16" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de24 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ONLY ORDER granting Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Stay. Plaintiffs Response to Defendants 17 Motion for Summary Judgment was due on 11/7/2016. Plaintiff mistakenly believed that the Response deadline would be set at the Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 11/18/2016. Because a dispositive motion is currently pending, the Court VACATES the 11/18/2016 Status Conference and resets Plaintiffs Response deadline to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment to 12/2/2016. As noted in this Courts prior Order granting dismissal in 14-1264 and Order denying Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, the statute of limitations issue would be addressed first. Therefore, no future scheduling will be set until the Court has ruled on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/16/2016. (SJP, ilcd) (Entered: 11/16/2016)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de24 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de24 hasJudgeReference SJ001502 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de24 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de18 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de24 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01121_de23 @default.