Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:16-cv-01139_de4> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01139_de4 RegisterActionDate "2016-05-24" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01139_de4 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER denying 2 the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Unredacted Copy of Complaint Under Seal WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will stay unsealing the Complaint and attached Exhibits for 14 days. Therefore, the Plaintiff must re-file the motion within those 14 days (6/7/2016) that complies with Local Rules 5.10(A)(2) and 5.11. Specifically, the Plaintiff must include a memorandum that explains: 1) the reasons for why redacting the Complaint and Exhibits and sealing both is appropriate; and 2) whether the redactions made are either those properly subject to redaction under Local Rule 5.11(A) or those that fall within the categories identified in 7th Circuit precedent (i.e. trade secrets, information covered by a recognized privilege, and information required by statute to be maintained in confidence). The Court notes that completely redacting voluminous exhibits to a complaint is improper. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 5/24/2016. (KZ, ilcd) (Entered: 05/24/2016)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01139_de4 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01139_de4 hasJudgeReference SJ001513 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01139_de4 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01139_de1 @default.