Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de31> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de31 RegisterActionDate "2018-03-23" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de31 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER: GRANTING 22 , the Respondent's Motion to Correct Order. The Court notes that the Petitioner has no objection. Upon review, the Court shares the Respondent's concern that some of the language in the order could be construed to imply that the Petitioner's plea agreement was pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. In fact, the plea agreement at issue was clearly pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(A) and (B). The language of the agreement cited by the Court explicitly states as such. The Court hereby VACATES 21 , its Order. An amended Order will follow correcting the language complained of by the Respondent. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 3/23/2018. (ilcd, RT) Modified on 3/26/2018 to include initials of docketed by (JRK, ilcd). (Entered: 03/23/2018)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de31 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de31 hasJudgeReference SJ001502 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de31 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de27 @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de31 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01382_de28 @default.