Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:17-cv-01219_de86> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01219_de86 RegisterActionDate "2018-10-04" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01219_de86 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/4/18. Plaintiff's motion to terminate or to strike deposition 67 is DENIED. In the instant motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to strike his deposition because it was taken in bad faith based upon counsel from another case that is pending before this Court being present during his deposition and interrupting his testimony. However, as Defendants argue, there is no bar on multiple attorneys representing the same party at a deposition. Bohen v. City of East Chicago, 666 F. Supp. 154, 157 (N.D. Ind. 1987)("Use of more than one lawyer is common in legal practice. Consultation among lawyers ensures that they do not overlook significant facts or inquiries.... Two lawyers are the minimum in much private litigation."). Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any prejudice, and therefore, his motion is denied. (SKR, ilcd) (Entered: 10/04/2018)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01219_de86 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01219_de86 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01219_de82 @default.