Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de90> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de90 RegisterActionDate "2018-12-04" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de90 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 12/4/2018. On November 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion claiming Defendants were not following court orders. 61 . On November 26, 2018, the Court interpreted the motion as a motion to compel discovery alleging Defendants had not provided the initial discovery required in the Scheduling Order. See September 28, 2018 Scheduling Order. Defendants have until December 10, 2018 to file a response. See November 26, 2018 Text Order. Plaintiff has now filed an additional motion to compel stating Defendants "should be given ten days from December 3, 2018 to produce" a relevant video or sanctions should be imposed. 65 . It appears Plaintiff is claiming he sent a discovery request to Defendants. However, Plaintiff has not provided a copy of his discovery request as required. See September 28, 2018 Scheduling Order, p. 5, para 16. In addition, Defendants have 30 days to respond to a discovery response. Finally, Plaintiff's motion is repetitive of his last motion to compel. Therefore, the motion is denied. 65 . The Clerk is to provide Plaintiff with another copy of the Scheduling Order. Plaintiff must read and follow the directions provided in this order.(JS, ilcd) (Entered: 12/04/2018)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de90 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de90 hasJudgeReference SJ001502 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de90 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de83 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de90 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01264_de89 @default.