Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;2:16-cv-02004_de37> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;2:16-cv-02004_de37 RegisterActionDate "2017-05-17" @default.
- ilcd;;2:16-cv-02004_de37 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 5/17/2017. Defendant's Motion to Seal Exhibit K to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 23 is DENIED. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.11, litigants are required to redact documents that contain information that should not be made public. A document, however, should only be filed under seal, in unredacted form, when redactions will result in a document's intent being unclear. C.D. Ill. R. 5.11(B). Additionally, a document that is filed in conjunction with a dispositive motion enters the public record because the public has a right to know what materials a judge uses to dispose of a case. See Baxter Int'l, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 297 F.3d 544, 546 (7th Cir. 2002). It appears to the Court that Exhibit K to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment does contain information regarding a third party that should be protected. However, this information can easily be redacted without rendering the document's intent unclear. Therefore, the Court directs the Clerk to remove Exhibit K from Exhibit 2 [22-2] to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk should then refile Exhibit 2 [22-2] without Exhibit K. Plaintiff is ordered to refile Exhibit K to his Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment with the name of the Heartland resident redacted. (JMB, ilcd) (Entered: 05/17/2017)" @default.
- ilcd;;2:16-cv-02004_de37 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;2:16-cv-02004_de37 hasJudgeReference SJ001514 @default.
- ilcd;;2:16-cv-02004_de37 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;2:16-cv-02004_de36 @default.