Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de120> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de120 RegisterActionDate "2017-01-06" @default.
- ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de120 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 1/6/2017. Defendants' motion for a protective order 66 is granted to the extent Defendants ask for the Court to review the documents filed under seal. A separate order shall enter regarding the production of those documents to Plaintiff. Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied 70 . The Court does not have the authority to require an attorney to accept pro bono appointment on a civil case such as this. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 653 (7th Cir. 2007). The most the Court can do is ask for volunteer counsel. In determining whether the Court should attempt to find an attorney to voluntarily take the case, the question is "given the difficulty of the case, does the plaintiff appear competent to litigate it himself?" Pruitt, 503 F.3d at 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). On this record, Plaintiff appears competent to proceed pro se. His pleadings adequately convey the basis for his claims and demonstrate knowledge of the applicable law and legal procedure. He already has personal knowledge of many of the facts which he believes give rise to his claim (retaliation and discrimination). Plaintiff may renew his motion on a more developed factual record, setting forth his educational level, any jobs he has had inside or outside of prison or the detention facility, any classes he has taken in prison or the detention facility, and his litigation experience in state and federal court. (KE, ilcd) (Entered: 01/06/2017)" @default.
- ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de120 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de120 hasJudgeReference SJ001500 @default.
- ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de120 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de72 @default.
- ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de120 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;4:16-cv-04010_de77 @default.