Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 10 of
10
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 RegisterActionDate "2005-11-10" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Judge Jeffrey Cole : Motion hearing held on 11/10/2005. Plaintiff's objections to defendants' exhibits 121 and 122 are denied; plaintiff's motion to vacate the order of 10/4/05 115 is denied as moot since plaintiff appeared for her deposition; plaintiff's motion to vacate the order entered on 10/21/05 117 is denied; plaintiff's motion to extend discovery 114 is denied without prejudice in the event Mr. Zidek remains in the case and chooses to refile the motion; the plaintiff's motion for recusal as a matter of right and emergency change of venue 125 is denied as legally baseless; plaintiff's motion for a qualified protective order 126 is denied. The defendants? motion to compel discovery or in the alternative, enter an order recommending that the amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice is entered and continued pending Mr. Zidek's status in the case. Ms. 45E027D or 3C3A1D3 has made representations in open court that she is not claiming physical harm and that she is perfectly willing to sign appropriate waivers so that the defendants can obtain certain relevant medical records. At her deposition, she has repudiated those representations, and indeed, it appears that following a court appearance, she told counsel for the defendants that despite what she said in open court, she would not abide by the promises made in my presence. She has refused to answer questions on relevancy grounds and has raised what appear to be baseless Fifth Amendment objections to questions. For example, although she claimed that the police physically attacked her, she asserted the Fifth Amendment to the question "how did they physically attack you?" Defendants' motion for payment of $70.00 in costs in connection with Ms. 45E027D or 3C3A1D3 failure to sit for her noticed deposition on 10/20/05 is granted. The case is set for further status on 11/23/05 at 9:00 a.m. At that time, I will rule on defendants' motion compel discovery or to recommend that the case be dismissed with prejudice. (lcw, ) (Entered: 11/15/2005)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 AdministrativeID "131" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de134 @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de135 @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de138 @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de140 @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de141 @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de144 @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de152 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:02-cv-07384_de145 @default.