Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:04-cv-03904_de124> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 3 of
3
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:04-cv-03904_de124 RegisterActionDate "2005-05-25" @default.
- ilnd;;1:04-cv-03904_de124 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MOTION by defendants in limine No. 1 to bar, or in the alternative limit expert economist Stan Smith's testimony; motion in limine No. 2 to bar use of the term "homicide" at trial; motion in limine No. 3 to bar Mr. Sullivan as an expert testimony in police policies and procedures; motion in limine No. 4 to bar any evidence regarding race or speculative racial motivation; motion in limine No. 5 to bar any statements, references, or evidence that the defendant officers failed to provide adequate medical care; motion in limine No. 6 to bar evidence regarding defendant Soto's prior use of alcohol; motion in limine No. 7 to bar evidence of Merlene Hicks alleged medical state and hospitalization; motion in limine No. 8 to bar evidence of Christopher Hicks' relationship with any other family members; motion in limine No. 9 to bar evidence regarding Christopher Hicks' alleged new job; motion in limine No. 10 to bar reference to photographs of Christopher Hicks in the army, with family members, and the video of his funeral services; motion in limine No. 11 to bar plaintiff from making any reference to the individual defendants' discussions with union representatives; motion in limine No. 12 to bar plaintiff from making any reference to the fraternal order of police police disclaimer; motion in limine No. 13 to bar plaintiff from arguing that the police generally protect or cover up for other officers' misconduct; motion in limine No. 14 to bar plaintiff's counsel from creating adverse trial publicity against defendants; motion in limine No. 15 to bar testimony regarding the post-investigation of this incident; motion in limine No. 16 to bar the testimony by detective Rickey Galbreth, any other investigators, or any evidence regarding the office of professional standards' investigation of the May 24th incident; motion in limine No. 17 to bar evidence of remedial measures by the Chicago Police Department; motion in limine No. 18 to bar evidence including but not limited to civilian complaints, lawsuits, employee or other disciplinary proceedings pending or past claims against defendant officers; motion in limine No. 19 to bar prior disciplinary records of any officers involved in the incident; motion in limine No. 20 to bar the medical examiner's death certificate and use of the term "Homicide" to refer to the death of the decedent in other trial materials; motion in limine No. 21 to bar any testimony or evidence suggesting that the defendants may be indemnified by the City of Chicago for any compensatory damages returned against them; motion in limine No. 22 to bar other publicized events concerning allegations of police misconduct; motion in limine No. 23 to bar non-party witnesses from the courtroom; motion in limine No. 24 to exclude any of Christopher Hicks' family members from the courtroom; motion in limine No. 25 to bar plaintiff's reference to any violation of police department general orders; Notice. (lcw, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:04-cv-03904_de124 AdministrativeID "123" @default.