Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:06-cv-00909_de23> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 3 of
3
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:06-cv-00909_de23 RegisterActionDate "2006-08-02" @default.
- ilnd;;1:06-cv-00909_de23 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.: Defendants' Motion to Clarify [23-1] is granted. Leave granted to file motion for Summary Judgment on issue of probable cause to arrest on Count One and the excessive force claim in Count Two by 8/24/2006, Plaintiff's Response is due by 9/8/2006, and Defendants' Reply is due by 9/25/2006. See Sornberger v. City of Knoxville, Ill, 434. F.3d 1006, 1014 (7th Cir. 2006)("whether a reasonable officer could have had believed that he had probable cause is usually decided by the court before trial,") see also Pourghoraishi v. Flying J., et al., 449 F.3d 544,547 (7th Cir. 2006) (quoting Potts v. City of Lafayette, 121 F.3d adequate assurance that the suspension is not unjustified." Gilbert v. Homar. 520 U.S. 924,934 (1997) (quoting FDIC v. Mallen 486 U.S. 239-240-41 (1988)). The trial date stands. It is so ordered. Mailed notices (gcy, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:06-cv-00909_de23 AdministrativeID "24" @default.