Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-00623_de110> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00623_de110 RegisterActionDate "2011-11-04" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00623_de110 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon: Defendants motion for reconsideration 103 of the order allowing plaintiffs to file their unopposed attorneys fees is granted. The court granted plaintiffs motion to submit unopposed attorneys fees after defendants failed to respond to the motion by September 27, 2011, the deadline set by the court. [97, 102] Defendants now assert they misunderstood the courts order and submitted their fee petition objections directly to plaintiffs by September 27, rather than submitting their response to the court. Good cause exists to vacate the order. Plaintiffs gave defendants the billing records underlying the fee petition after the offer of judgment was accepted, but before judgment was entered and while negotiations with Magistrate Judge Valdez were ongoing. This ambiguous timing did not give defendants clear notice that plaintiffs were beginning the Local Rule 54.3 process. Accordingly, the parties shall attempt to come to an agreement on attorneys fees. If no agreement is reached, defendants shall comply with Local Rule 54.3(d)(5) by November 18, 2011. If agreement is still not reached, the fee petition with the joint statement under Local Rule 54(e) shall be filed by December 5, 2011. Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 11/04/2011)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00623_de110 AdministrativeID "109" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00623_de110 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-00623_de104 @default.